Documents
Documents
Welcome
Why Misaki Studio
Compare
Start Here
Concepts
Guides
AI Agents
Account
Reference
Troubleshooting
Examples

Examples

The claim is that what you draw is what compiles. Here is the demonstration.

You are looking at one

This website — the marketing pages, and the documentation you are reading now — was designed in Misaki Studio and runs on the React it exported.

Not a demo built to be shown. The product's own shopfront, maintained the same way you would maintain yours:

  • Generated files in the site's source 187.

  • Lines of generated code ~45,000.

  • Files carrying shipped timeline animation 25.

Every one of those files opens with the same line:

// This file is generated by Misaki Studio. Do not edit.

Nobody hand-edits them. A design change is re-exported and the diff is reviewed like any other code change.

What a component actually looks like

This is atoms/Mark — a small real component from this site, exported as-is, with only the render body elided for length:

// This file is generated by Misaki Studio. Do not edit.
"use client";
import * as react from "react";
import * as msi from "misaki-studio-internal";
import styles from "./mark.module.scss";

export type Props = { title: string };

export const DefaultProps: Props = { title: "Title" };

export const Component = ({
  className = "",
  style,
  divProps,
  properties = DefaultProps,
}: {
  className?: string;
  style?: React.CSSProperties;
  divProps?: msi.DivProps;
  properties?: Props;
}) => {
  ...
};

Three details are what make this usable rather than merely generated:

  • It is typed. Props is a real exported type. A caller passing the wrong thing fails at compile time.

  • It accepts a className and a style. You can drop it into your own layout and adjust it from outside without touching the file.

  • The design system came through as variables, not as baked values. Its stylesheet references var(--svgs-types-icons-mark, none) — so re-theming the project re-themes this component.

Variants and slots survive the trip

Here is the type surface of atoms/Button from the same site:

export const Variants = {
  default: undefined,
  sizeSmall: "Enn689k",
  typeSecondary: "E3zlmqe",
  plain: "Enfe2vo",
  typeGhost: "E3q0sbl",
};
export type Children = { left?: React.ReactNode; right?: React.ReactNode };

and the prop that consumes them:

variant?: (keyof typeof Variants)[];

That is an array, key-checked against the variants the design declares — so variant={["typeGhost", "sizeSmall"]} composes both, and a typo is a compile error rather than a silently unstyled button. The named children slots the designer drew are left and right, and they arrive as a typed object.

None of that was written by hand, and none of it is a comment describing intent. It is the design, compiled.

Animation that ships

Timelines are not a preview feature. Twenty-five of this site's generated files carry timeline data, which the runtime plays in the browser — the same timeline the designer scrubbed, exported as data rather than re-implemented by a developer afterwards.

Start from something real

Rather than reading about it, open a project and take it apart. Published templates open in the playground, so you can inspect a finished design's element tree, its variants and its logic, and export it to see what comes out.

Where next
On this page
Examples
You are looking at one
What a component actually looks like
Variants and slots survive the trip
Animation that ships
Start from something real
Where next